Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wrs

E36 Top Hat changed to M3

Recommended Posts

Recently I changed to M3 top hats (pre-96 type) - I'd previously changed the LCA bushes to the M3 type. The extra castor is excellent.

Over the weekend one of the swaybar nylocks came a bit loose and while tightening it up I noticed the spring ledge on the strut will likely not clear the strut tower wall if I was to hit a really big bump. There's about 45mm clearance from the ledge to the inside of the wheel arch/inner-guard so it would need to be a big bump. However, it it was ever to happen the back edge of the spring ledge would make contact with the body of the car. The M3 has a smaller diameter ledge and spring - I'm guessing this is the reason why.

So, how to fix it - looks like I'll need to change to M3 struts.

Has anyone else changed to M3 top-hats on non-M3 struts and noticed a clearance issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pre-'96 top hats? I thought they were the same as or similar to non-M ones. It's the '96 (Evo) ones that have the extra caster built in. Maybe that's the same for the 3.0, I can't remember.

Either way, the Evo, with the offset tophats do have less clearance and that's why the Evo springs are conical, I assume the shocks match the springs so will be smaller than non-M ones.

If you go to M3 struts I'd also change to M3 droplinks (strut mounted). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, thanks. Already have the M3 droplinks. I wish I'd known there could be clearance issues before fitting the M3 top hats as I sourced early E36 non-M3 struts to get the top swaybar mount. These were then modified by Stocks for Koni adjustables. Might have to go with adjustable top hats instead so I can set the castor to the maximum possible without clearance problems. Have to re-cert anyway so may as well get everything sorted prior.

Edited by wrs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool, thanks. That sounds like a totally workable solution. If I drill the right sized hole the studs can probably be pressed back in. 1.5 degrees loss of castor should be ok as a compromise to save a lot of additional expense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, gain over standard but a loss of 1.5 from what I have now (7.5 deg)...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, No camber offset. I have the type that has the small diameter rubber which looks like it could be a bit longer than the wide rubber type. I think the offset Evo type (probably the same as yours) has the same diameter rubber area (small) as the type I have which means it should be the same overall height.

When I changed from the standard E36 centered top hat to the M3 type it was taller in height by what appears to be about 20mm.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...