advantex

A bit more info turned up in my mail box this morning. Links also to a video. http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/s...nds-75-mpg/496/

Those are really cool Glenn. Thanks for sharing.

I also have not been impressed with that particular product although it has not done my interior any harm. However, I am very impressed with the bulk of their products, if you use them as directed (very important), they produce good results.

Suggest that if you deal with people who know and use leather, trust in their advice perhaps. Let them reccomend. I did. I used a $10 product exactly how they told me to and the result was nothing short of astounding! Only used it yesterday so can't comment on long term result, but the if the immediate result is any indication, I have nothing to worry about.

Ace comment! love it - but don't inhale please, could be worse.I smoke, give up every night. Its the staying 'gived up' thats not easy. One day when it is right it will happen.

White and looking better now than it ever did (thanks Brent).Agree with Spider Man, have seen that about now and then. Not sure on schnitzer. Went to super cheap auto the other day and when I drove around the back I saw a bimmer with Schnitzer AC5 pinstriped across the back. There was a car coming other way so didn't get a good look - could be same one? There are heaps of BMW's in Gisborne, 10 within 1k radius of me that I have seen and plenty elsewhere around the city.

Not sure thats why I posted this [All in E mode] - Around town, no different. Slow accel 50-70k feel change at about 65/70k. Slow accel 70-100k another change at about 100k (that makes 5). 100-90k decelerate, can feel change and engine braking if continuing to decelerate [slow accelerate up from this causes change back again at about 100k] Fast accel 70-120k no change, ease back acceleration and two changes follow.

Just a simple post - 535 E34 auto Gisborne - Auckland - Gisborne at 9.8l/100km according to computer. Worked out from recipts and milage to be pretty much the same figure. Not bad for a19year old 3.5 auto.

Need someone to enlighten me on auto for the 535iA M-Sport [1989 E34]. It is a four speed (I assume - 1.2.3.D etc) yet there are 5 changes so I take that it has like an overdrive as well? Sorry, dont know what model auto it is.

You missed my favourite - something you often find in smaller towns and cities mainly in rush hours... Purposefully cueing over a round-a-bout Gad I hate that!

Thanks, that was interesting reading. Have bookmarked the page. I also not there does not seem to be any requirement for your spedo to read reasonably accurately - if I read that correctly - it just states that it must function (specifically) in forward motion.

Totally agree here! I also have Toyota Hiace van. It is 89old and looks shabby. Every time I go through a warrent, it takes them at least 1/2hr. They pull everything apart, inspect every nook and cranny. Last time it failed because there was a rip in the seat and the foam had worn (getting in and out of van) and the metal under the seat was exposed. I cannot believe there is a "regulation" covering that - I may be wrong - but it is not a big hole nor is it a hazard of any kind I am aware of.Seems to me just a way of "we got to find something wrong with this old van!" type attitude. Opinions or fact? I believe you can read the entire inspection regulations somewhere online, but not found them yet.

Had a mate round for a night. We ate piza and spent evening searching youtube for something different. Grabbed a few links you may wish to click and follow - wait this one out, he is really very good!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSmxaORvBQI...feature=related - gokart with a difference - bike riding extreme - differenthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM3vOzq8fCY...feature=related - even more different http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V28w0bx5Vsc - kewl clip from a movie (can just imagine this) - anyone for a caravan for the holidaysenjoy

Used to go out with a blonde. She wasn't that thick but damn she was wide! Good joke, guys at work loved it.

Found some Tui’s in the fridge so this is just a load of waffle really… I don’t want to go down the digital track. It is bad enough having CD’s and electronic media – but it is very practical. Technology is getting better, however the brain is better still and even though I am getting old and got hairy ears (LOL) there is an ‘overall’ difference between analogue and digital that one can’t necessarily put a definite finger on but it just doesn’t sound as good (and its not just a mind set thing, it is very real). That may change over time, but even today there is a big difference between a digital .wav file and the same .mp3/.wma or whatever and it’s not in the initial listening either, it comes from subtle things like overall presence of sound, long term comfort with what you’re listening to, missing bits that your brain remembers but are not there and that which your brain predicts will be next but doesn’t happen, unexpected distortion or aptitude drop etc. Same-same can be applied in similar sense to class A/ AB or D amps. Why do we need MP3 etc anyway? It was great back in the days when the biggest flash memory you could get was 64meg, but with the 16+gig CF cards of today? Today’s reason is surely copyright and royalty based or Apple/ Microsoft driven. You can get a cut down version of a song for nothing or little, but you need to pay the price for quality (the original CD sound). Big Boy commerce is locking us into a trend, which albeit is viable, is not necessarily good and just like fashion, it will eventually change once more. Just like vynal is on the way back! - or so I hear anyway. The more I think about sound, the more I feel it is a matter of comfort (i.e. harmony, melody, correct emphasis and other suchlike ‘mushy’ terms). It’s not what you listen to, its how your brain reacts on an emotional and comfort level to the composition. This is why I want .wav – at least I get what was originally recorded (good or bad). I like 3doors Down but I dislike some of their compositions because they just don’t sound good. I like Brook Fraser but I dislike some of her songs because they do nothing for me. Two scenarios – one doesn’t fit the ‘comfort’ criteria, the other doesn’t fit the ‘emotional’ criteria. Yet, others may like the ones I dislike. Same seems to go for in car sounds I have listened to so far. I (personally) find either find over-emphasis (uncomfortable) or blandness (unemotional – as in no impact). As Rogan rightly pointed out, the missing bits in many audio systems seem to be the bits your brain expects to hear when you are listening and feels short changed when it’s not there. This is the very important low to mid frequency range that we humans use most – i.e the vocal range, the guitar strum, the sax, the whatever you like to listen to that “fills†the emotional response because of its delicately balanced volume in conjunction with the rest of the composition and instruments used and creates the impact you like according to your taste. You can have your body moving bass, you ear piercing treble, but none of this matters if you don’t have the “overall sound†“the presence†that moves the heart which is in harmony with these other impactive and characterizing sounds, deep bass and spine chilling treble that are a part of the entire composition. If you’re favorite song brings tears to you eyes when you play it really loud, you got a good system. If it doesn’t either it’s not your favorite song, or your system does not do your song justice. Would that be fair comment? Edit: aptitude->amptitude