JiB 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2009 (edited) I found this on the interwebs and thought it was the best thing evar. 2002, 9,000rpm, three wheelin' on 9"s. Bad ass. tyres = 11.60/4.30x13" F / 11.60/4.50x13" rims = 8"wide front - 9"wide rear 212 HP & 9,000 rpm redline ? weight 890 kg / 1950 lbs 4.109 kg per PS / 2.2 lbs per .98HP - power to weight ratio cam = Dr. Schrick 324 valve lift 12mm cam valve opening in degrees 47*BTDC / 39*ATDC & 44*BTDC / 38*ATDC compression pressure 110kg / 240 pounds ? SOLEX 45 DDH carbs oil cap. = 5 liters 100 litre gas tank / 27 Gal. Borg & Beck clutch 4 or 5-speed gear box depending on course 75% lockup diff 19 mm anti-sway bar cost = 32,000 to 34,000 Marks for 200 HP motor - 5.600 Marks 1/4 mile = 14.5 seconds 0 - 100 KM/h (62 MPH) = 7.4 seconds 0 - 140 KM/h ( 85 MPH) = 12.9 seconds top speed 195 KM/h = 124 mph @ Hockenheimring edit: attached big photos Edited May 16, 2009 by JiB Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creaver 55 Report post Posted May 16, 2009 That's a bit slower than I would've thought in a straight line? Given the power/weight Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CamB 48 Report post Posted May 16, 2009 Acceleration or top speed? Top speed is quite badly affected by crap aerodynamics, with the wide wheel arches making it worse. Mine basically hit a wall at about 170kph with 130hp. It would keep accelerating, but Puke's straight wasn't long enough! Acceleration probably affected by gearing and peaky nature of engine. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jamez 2147483647 Report post Posted May 17, 2009 Mike Delmonts 2002ti hits 270km/h down the back straight of puki.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driftit 2069 Report post Posted May 17, 2009 (edited) Mike Delmonts 2002ti hits 270km/h down the back straight of puki.... Thats only cause he runs out of straight. lol. My 325 3 wheels coming through castrol. Have some photos somewhere. 320 doesn't though. Must be due to the 325 having a front and rear sway bar. Edited May 17, 2009 by driftit Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CamB 48 Report post Posted May 17, 2009 Mike Delmonts 2002ti hits 270km/h down the back straight of puki.... Mike has switches on his centre console marked 400hp, 500hp, 600hp and 700hp (actually I remember seeing only 3 switches, but 700hp was the top one I am sure). Assuming they work (and I don't see why not), I have a feeling that overcomes any aerodynamic issues. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sp8s 1 Report post Posted May 17, 2009 Mike has switches on his centre console marked 400hp, 500hp, 600hp and 700hp (actually I remember seeing only 3 switches, but 700hp was the top one I am sure). Assuming they work (and I don't see why not), I have a feeling that overcomes any aerodynamic issues.Where can I get some of those switch's. I could use some of that HP in the compact Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CamB 48 Report post Posted May 17, 2009 This is a good start... http://www.nzperformance.co.nz/store/garre...z/prod_192.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Apex 693 Report post Posted May 18, 2009 Nice wee car! Go the Red Pig in that first thumbnail That thing was epic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
e30plz 1 Report post Posted May 18, 2009 Mike has switches on his centre console marked 400hp, 500hp, 600hp and 700hp (actually I remember seeing only 3 switches, but 700hp was the top one I am sure). Assuming they work (and I don't see why not), I have a feeling that overcomes any aerodynamic issues. VideoWhat motor is that? An M10?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CamB 48 Report post Posted May 18, 2009 Its an M10, albeit a well modified one! It's still 8 valves. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rxsumo 33 Report post Posted May 18, 2009 That's a bit slower than I would've thought in a straight line? Given the power/weight I would agree, a stock E3 3.0Si would achieve very slightly slower 0-60 times (7.5s), and a much higher top speed (132 mph) with the same bhp, and at least 50% more kerb weight. The only real factors I can see screwing up the acceleration would be a ridiculously high first gear in the C/R box and a camshaft that was all about HP and had little or no usable torque. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites