kiwi535 538 Report post Posted June 18, 2008 E39 530 Auto Round town 11.4 L/100Km Motorway @ 105Km/h 8.9 L/100Km Average as per computer 10.8L/100Km thats excellent for a heavy three leitre car isnt it!Why oh why arent there any six speed manual 530's Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
briancol 3 Report post Posted June 18, 2008 1996 E36 2.5ltr. coupe Around town 10ltrs/100kms Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OP6 27 Report post Posted June 30, 2008 E36 325 coupe manual, city 10l/100kms country8l/100kms Z3 1.9 manual city 11l/100kms country 8l/100kms E30 318 manual (facelift) city 12l/100kms country 9l/100kms E30 320 manual city 14l/100kms country 10.5l/100kms Figures do vary according to who is driving! But these are averages over a years driving between 3 drivers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pjay 8 Report post Posted June 30, 2008 (edited) Edit.. ive already posted my figures.. doh Edited June 30, 2008 by Pjay Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aaronmartin 0 Report post Posted July 4, 2008 I've had my X5 4.4i for just on 10,000km now, and I reset the second trip computer (CONSUMPTION2) when I drove out of the yard. Since I bought it the CONSUMPTION2 says I have averaged 13.7L/100km. CONSUMPTION1 I reset each tank, my best tank so far I got 11.3L/100km, worst tank so far 15.8L/100km. I do a 80%/15%/5% mix of openroad / town driving / boat towing. To make it sound better I can always say that I can get 800km per tank in my V8 SUV :-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drifty325i 0 Report post Posted July 4, 2008 My 2007 Subaru Legacy 2lt manual does around 8.7litres per 100km normal fast driving. When I thrash it (and i really mean thrash it) I get around 10.5lt per 100km so its prettygood really. The V8 e30 I'm not to sure, Its not great because the only time i drive it I'm really thrashing it lol. Ma-by 400km to the tank on a good day Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashok540 0 Report post Posted July 7, 2008 (edited) Have been testing fuel consumption on my 1998 540i. With BP 98 and Synergy 8000, am getting between 16 -16.5l/100km around town with heavy foot from traffic lights. Did one trip to Hamilton and back and that gave 15.2l/100km. Can't imagine that I can get better than this. Next 2 projects, find out consumption if all driving done in S mode and then if all driving in manual mode! I will be thrilled if the difference between normal and sport is not too much. Has anyone tried that? Edited July 7, 2008 by ashok540 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Apex 693 Report post Posted July 7, 2008 545i = 11.2 Town. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashok540 0 Report post Posted July 7, 2008 545i = 11.2 Town. WOW! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jochen 4 Report post Posted July 8, 2008 (edited) Did one trip to Hamilton and back and that gave 15.2l/100km. Can't imagine that I can get better than this. That's about 30% higher than normal. My 540i would do 10.8l/100km on the same trip. Either you have a lead foot, or you need to do a tune-up. check plugs, filters, and O2 sensors, and possibly cats. Worn O2 sensors will increase fuel consumption quite a bit. Can be checked on the GT1 system. Edited July 8, 2008 by jochen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greenday-rulz21 6 Report post Posted July 8, 2008 That's about 30% higher than normal. My 540i would do 10.8l/100km on the same trip. Either you have a lead foot, or you need to do a tune-up. Word! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Simo 0 Report post Posted July 8, 2008 (edited) 1994 E36 325ic 2.5l best 10.5l/100km worst (round town) 13l/100km. Anyone use 91 unleaded in these vehicles, good/bad?? Edited July 8, 2008 by Simo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bmw.maniac 1 Report post Posted July 8, 2008 Anyone use 91 unleaded in these vehicles, good/bad?? Please don't use that sh*t in you car! 91 is lawnmower fuel only! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Simo 0 Report post Posted July 9, 2008 Please don't use that sh*t in you car! 91 is lawnmower fuel only! Nuf Said! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrew 30 Report post Posted July 9, 2008 Please don't use that sh*t in you car! 91 is lawnmower fuel only! 91 is fine. I'd reckon your 318 would probably get better economy with it. I use it in my 323 and get circa 70kms more a tank than 98. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kiwi535 538 Report post Posted July 9, 2008 91 is fine. I'd reckon your 318 would probably get better economy with it. I use it in my 323 and get circa 70kms more a tank than 98. i also use it in the 535.Its the recomended grade for the car.I use 95 if i am doing a ghymkhana or something like that where i might be using higher throttle openings at relatively low revs than normal driving.Sometimes i might use 95 on a trip.I have never heard any signs of pinking Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pjay 8 Report post Posted July 10, 2008 a mate told me the higher the octane, the hotter it burns at.. is that right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghost 0 Report post Posted July 10, 2008 24l/100km from OBC e34 M5 Ash Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashok540 0 Report post Posted July 10, 2008 That's about 30% higher than normal. My 540i would do 10.8l/100km on the same trip. Either you have a lead foot, or you need to do a tune-up. check plugs, filters, and O2 sensors, and possibly cats. Worn O2 sensors will increase fuel consumption quite a bit. Can be checked on the GT1 system. Guess I will need Glenn's help on this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ducatiss 1 Report post Posted July 10, 2008 a mate told me the higher the octane, the hotter it burns at.. is that right? No thats not right. It is only a measure of the fuel's resistance to pre-ignition or knock resistance. IE the higher the octane the less likely the fuel is to pre-ignite under certain controlled conditions in a test engine. However if you run a lower octane than the engine is designed for and you get pre-ignition, this lowers the power output of the engine and if not controlled through engine management, will eventually ruin it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
caleb 0 Report post Posted January 19, 2009 (edited) E46 320i 63L tank 11.8 km/l Edited May 27, 2009 by bimmer77 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites