Jump to content

bmw.maniac

Members
  • Content Count

    647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About bmw.maniac

  • Rank
    3rd Gear

Previous Fields

  • Name
    Eddy G
  • Location
    Wellington
  • Car
    '02 330i

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2593 profile views
  1. bmw.maniac

    E30 Parts

    Zinno? What condition is the boot and bonnet in?
  2. Sounds like Tony Shelly was a bit of a character. Owned a BMW dealership in Hawaii and looks like his sons now run a couple of BMW and Merc dealerships in Southern California. http://archives.starbulletin.com/98/10/08/business/story3.html
  3. They used to have a showroom on Wakefield street where the bowling alley is now. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwIl2jVlvsM
  4. How will they ticket the registered owner if there are no plates (keeping in mind the VIN isn't visible from the windscreen on E30s)?
  5. Beautiful example. These don't come up often now. Expect it to go for a small fortune.
  6. I've heard you can get a VAT refund if you buy and then export from the UK. Does anyone know if this is the case? Would sweeten an already pretty sweet deal.
  7. I disagree. Darren handed over his credit card, and anyone who rents a car would presumably be aware that a charge will be made against it in the event of damage. If Darren was aware that a charge could be made, then he accepted that the company can make a charge against his card. However, if he did not (say the situation was Darren handed over the card to pay for the rental fee ONLY, but the company kept his card details without his knowledge, then it is not legitimate to place a charge on the card). The act of placing the charge is legitimate, as if Darren did in fact damage the car the company should be able to charge for any damage if the renter accepts these charges. However, Darren would want to challenge the basis for placing the charge, not the actual charge itself. Disputes Tribunal has a fixed $50 fee. The process is so straightforward that the biggest hassle is turning up. You would not make a claim in the District Court for a small matter such as this.
  8. Well then any lawyer would tell you than an implied term of that oral agreement was that you would be liable for damage. Even passing him your credit card with the knowledge it would be used as a bond (or giving the number over the phone) could be seen as accepting that you would be liable for damage.
  9. In the eyes of the bank it is a legitimate transaction. Darren supplied his card and (presumably) signed an agreement making him liable for any damage, and the lessor has alleged that the car was damaged.
  10. Hope you didn't admit that you did it. Pretty silly move I think. In this sort of situation you wouldn't deal with a court or a lawyer at all. Best bet would be to file a claim with the disputes tribunal ($50, no lawyers allowed to represent you).
  11. Who cares if he's a tool. I have nothing but respect for him if he's managed to get Jaguar NZ to drop their retail prices by 20%+ He has a point about the warranty. However it would of course depend on the precise terms of the warranty (whether you have to purchase it from an authorised dealer in the home country or whether you could claim back from wherever Beacham got the cars). I had a quick scan of the terms and it seems a bit ambiguous; would make an interesting contract law case.
  12. Prince of Monaco is selling his original 500SEC AMG by auction. Estimation: 15-25k Euros Click here
  13. A has right of way. In saying that, A should recognise the tendency of Car B to pull out without checking for traffic performing u-turns. A should be courteous.
×
×
  • Create New...