hybrid 1039 Report post Posted April 15, 2015 How not to f**k around on a build. epic. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kingkarl 136 Report post Posted April 15, 2015 I can't see the point personally. Why not buy an e92 m3?.. Which would look way better. Also Matt Farah is a terrible motor journalist. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kiwi328i 118 Report post Posted April 15, 2015 It's pretty unique, I will give it that, but meh, a lot of coin for what really is a slightly shrunken M3. Imagine that gear in an E30, much cheaper and I guess lighter still, now that would be the nuts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
m325i 705 Report post Posted April 16, 2015 I like Matt Farrah. I also like the 1M shape better than e92. This answers the 'what if it had the v8' question well. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jake1829 119 Report post Posted April 16, 2015 Interesting project - still prefer this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIe2rpAOamg Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_BRS_ 199 Report post Posted April 16, 2015 My girlfriend would hate this car, which is kinda why i love it, haha haha wonder how many of us can agree with this! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tristan 338 Report post Posted April 16, 2015 I like Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neal 512 Report post Posted April 16, 2015 Still like the 134 Judd v8 despite the tragedy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-lbxIJD3V8 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
M3_Power 636 Report post Posted April 17, 2015 (edited) The real M engine it should have had rather than the fake M hairdresser's one that it came with. Thumbs up from me. Edited April 17, 2015 by M3_Power Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
qube 3568 Report post Posted April 17, 2015 i quite like matt farah and his tuned shows. this one wasnt very fun though. car is awesome still Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jake1829 119 Report post Posted April 17, 2015 (edited) The real M engine it should have had rather than the fake M hairdresser's one that it came with. Thumbs up from me. LOL that hairdresser engine that's stock is holding 850+RWHP while that "M" engine needs the internals upgraded to hold the SS power which is significantly lower to me the last true M engines are the E46 , E60 - skip past the e9x platform and now the F series Edited April 17, 2015 by mod335 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kingkarl 136 Report post Posted April 24, 2015 LOL that hairdresser engine that's stock is holding 850+RWHP while that "M" engine needs the internals upgraded to hold the SS power which is significantly lower to me the last true M engines are the E46 , E60 - skip past the e9x platform and now the F series you realise the s65 (m3 v8) is the same engine as the s85 (m5 v10) minus two cylinders so if the e60 m5 counts, the e9x m3 definitely does too Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
