Jump to content

richard

Race Series Competitors
  • Content Count

    1446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by richard

  1. fiber cement check that its not asbestos
  2. richard

    my vj

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnDBbHwRk14 because I don't know how to cut and paste a small section of video I've put the whole video up . funniest part 4:21
  3. Geez you guys are getting good times. I used to run one of these. 2.5 ton 13.9 et.
  4. I found this guy interesting............ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTHVg0nID3s
  5. are you free handing or do you have a template
  6. Check out this ANCAP on the ford Mustang https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vupJqnNyaE
  7. richard

    E36 328I Track Car

    Mate their looking the part.
  8. Going on your answer Ron, if blueprinting is obsolete then so is engine balancing as the manufacture of parts can get it prefect. This is small write up ( better than I can do ). Engine Balance Due to the presence of the number of reciprocating parts, like piston, connecting rod, etc. which move once in one direction and then in other direction, vibration develops during operation of the engine. Excessive vibration occurs if the engine is unbalanced. It is, therefore, necessary to balance the engine for its smooth running. The vibration may be caused due to design factors or may result from poor maintenance of the engine. In order to minimize the vibration, attention must be given to the following parameters : (£) Primary balance («) Component balance (Hi) Firing interval (iv) Secondary balance. 2.8.1. Primary Balance When a piston passes through TDC and BDC, the change of direction produces an inertia force due to which the piston tends to move in the direction in which it was moving before the change. This force, called the primary force, increases with the rise of the engine speed, and unless counteracted produces a severe oscillation in the vertical plane, i.e., in line with the Fig. 2.40. Direction of primary force for single cylinder. Single-cylinder. Figure 2.40 illustrates the primary inertia forces developed in a single- cylinder engine. The diagram shows the direction and magnitude of the force for one revolution of the crankshaft, in which the upward direction has been considered as positive. Thus at TDC, the deceleration of the reciprocating masses (piston assembly and one-third of the connecting rod) produces an upward force on the engine. At BDC a similar force is also generated but the direction of the force is downwards. The effect of these two forces is such that when the engine is running it oscillates up and down at a frequency equal to the engine speed, causing vibration. This vibration of the engine can be reduced by adding counter-balance masses at A and B to exert an outward force with the rotation of the crankshaft. Also by varying these two masses, the outward force can be made to equalize the inertia forces Fi and F2. It may be noted that in positions other than the dead centers the counter-balance masses themsel- ves produce an out-of-balance force. This is un- desirable because it only shifts the plane of vibration from the vertical to the horizontal. There- fore, the counter-balance mass used on a single- cylinder engine is set to balance only half the reciprocating mass. As a result, vibration in the vertical and horizontal planes is expected in a single cylinder engine. To withstand this vibration all nuts and bolts used on vehicles propelled by single- cylinder engines should be adequately locked. Four-cylinder. The crank throw layout on a four-cylinder in-line engine and the direction of the primary forces are shown in Fig. 2.41. Primary balance is achieved in this arrangement, because the forces on the two pistons at TDC equal the forces on the pistons at BDC. The crankshaft throws (as shown in Fig. 2.41) are arranged so that forces acting on pistons 1 and 2 develop the opposite turning moment (couple) on the shaft axis to that produced by the forces on pistons 3 and 4. The opposing couples introduced by this crankshaft layout prevent the rocking action of the engine and consequently minimize fore and aft vibration of the engine. Counter-balance masses are added to the crankshaft to reduce the bending action on the crankshaft produced by the couples, and the high load on the center main bearing. Also, five main bearings are used to support the crankshaft, instead of the three commonly used in the past, so that a stiffer construction is obtained which is essential for the high-speed operations of modern engines. Three-cylinder. Consideration of balancing of a three-cylinder in-line unit is useful because it is used as a ‘straight’ in-line engine and also it forms the back unit for both the in-line six and V-six cylinder engines. Figure 2.42 illustrates the crankshaft layout and the primary forces when piston 1 is at TDC. In this case the crank throws are set at 120 degrees; therefore the large force at each of the dead centers is balanced by the two smaller forces on the other two pistons. These smaller forces are caused due to acceleration or deceleration of the piston as it approaches or leaves the end of the stroke. Fig. 2.41. Primary forces for four cylinders. Fig. 2.42. Primary forces for three cylinders. 2.8.2. Component Balance To minimize vibration, all components that rotate at high speeds must be balanced. This is specifically important for large heavy components such as a flywheel and clutch assembly. Even though these two parts are balanced individually within allowable limits, the mating of each part with the crankshaft axis is essential so that they ‘run true’. Various location devices such as spigots, registers and dowels are used to obtain mating of these components. Ideally the balancing of both the crankshaft and flywheel assembly as one unit is desirable because it avoids the ‘build-up of tolerances’. Vibration occurs when ‘heavy spots’ of each part are positioned so that they all act in the same direction. High cost associated with during manufacturing as well as repair generally rules out the use of this one-piece balancing method on mass-produced vehicles. Reciprocating masses should also be balanced to achieve good primary balance. All parts that move in this manner should have nearly equal weight. Balance of components should cover both static balance and dynamic balance. The static balance can be carried out by placing the shaft and/or component on two horizontal ‘knife-edges’, so that when released the heaviest part moves to the bottom. Dynamic balance requires expensive equipment, which rotates the part at high speed and indicates the extent and location of the heavy spots. Imbalance is normally corrected by removing metal by drilling one or more holes in the component at the heavy point. 2.8.3. Firing Interval The angle turned by the crankshaft between power strokes of a multi-cylinder engine should be regular to achieve maximum smoothness. Also if the more cylinders are fired during the 720 degrees period of the four-stroke cycle, the lower is the variation in the output torque, and the smoother is the flow of power to the road wheels (for details refer sections 2.4.2 and 2.6). 2.8.4. Secondary Balance The inertia forces considered during the study of primary balance are based on a piston movement, called simple harmonic motion (SHM). This type of reciprocating movement is illustrated in Fig. 2.43A. Let a point P travels at a constant speed around a circle of diameter AB, and another point N moves in a straight path from A to B. The point N is said to move in simple harmonic motion if it always keeps at the foot of the perpendicular NP. The velocity of point N varies as it travels across AB and this is represented by the graph (Fig. 2.43B). When the movement of an engine piston is compared with SHM, it can be seen that during the first 90 degrees rotation of the crank from TDC, the piston covers a greater distance and within the range 90-180 degrees it covers a smaller distance in the given time (Fig. 2.43C). This causes the following situations. (a) The piston travels more than half the stroke during movement of the crank from TDC to the 90 degrees position. (b) Considering the piston initially at TDC, the relative piston velocity for each 90 degrees of crank movement is fast, slow, slow, and fast. (c) The piston dwell, which is the angular period where piston movement is small in relation to crankshaft motion, at BDC is much greater than at TDC. id) The inertia force at TDC is much greater than at BDC. This last point demands for the engine balance if vibration is to be reduced. The study of engine balance requires the analysis of secondary balance, which involves the difference between actual piston movement and the ideal SHM. Fig. 2.43. SHM and actual piston motion. Figure 2.44 presents the primary force produced by SHM, and also the secondary force required to be added or subtracted to correspond the actual motion. It is observed that the frequency of the secondary force is twice the speed of the crankshaft. The information provided by this graph can be used to obtain the direction of the secondary force and this has been added to the diagram of the engine’shown in Fig. 2.45. The result indicates a four-cylinder in-line engine has very good primary balance but has poor secondary balance. This imbalance produces a vibration in the vertical plane at a frequency twice the speed of the crankshaft. In the past this vibration has been tolerated and soft rubber engine mountings have been used to prevent transmission of the engine vibration to the remainder of the vehicle. Fig. 2.44. Graph of secondary force. Fig. 2.45. Direction of primary and secondary forces. In the three- and six-cylinder in-line units, and V-six, the secondary forces balance out, and this is one reason why the six-cylinder in-line engine was used extensively in the past. Nowadays four-cylinder in-line units for engines up to about 2 liters capacity are preferred, because of promising economy resulting from lower frictional losses. When it is combined with the use of simpler engine management systems, a higher power to weight ratio can be obtained. In addition, the short and stubby crankshaft used on a four-cylinder unit does not produce severe torsional vibration problems associated with longer shafts. Secondary Harmonic Balancer. The use of a secondary harmonic balance is an effective method of eliminating secondary forces. Frederick Lanchester used this method first time in 1911 to balance four-cylinder engines. Even though this device was very effective, the use of soft rubber mountings instead of a damper continued for cost reasons. In 1975 Mitsubishi of Japan produced a secondary balancer, in several ways similar in principle to the Lanchester type. The engines using this arrangement are much smoother in operation. The principle of a secondary balancer is illustrated in Fig. 2.46. Two counter-balance shafts having offset masses are driven by the crankshaft at twice crankshaft speed. One counter- balance shaft is rotated clockwise and the other anti-clockwise. Both shafts are timed to the crankshaft so that when the piston is at TDC both masses exert a downward force. Fig. 2.46. Principle of secondary balancer. To counteract the secondary force on the engine, the balancer exerts an opposing force only when it is necessary. For four-cylinder in-line engines this is a maximum when at 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees rotation of the crankshaft. In Fig. 2.46A and C, this balancing force is downwards and upwards respectively. In Fig. 2.46B and D, the two masses of the balancer oppose each other causing a neutral effect. The engine attains a state of balance in these neutral positions. Mitsubishi Motors ‘Silent Shafts’ arrangement incorporates twin counter-balancing shafts with one shaft higher up the engine than the other (Fig. 2.47). This shaft arrangement damps the vertical vibration and also the secondary rolling couple, produced when the crankshaft is rotated by the force of combustion. The upper shaft rotates in the same direction as the crankshaft and the vertical spacing of the shafts is 0.7 times the length of the connecting rod. This arrangement of the counter-balance masses sets up a couple, which opposes the rolling couple. Balance of the rolling couple throughout the complete engine load range is not possible. Therefore a shaft position is optimised to minimize the unabalnced couple during the most frequently encountered road load conditions. The rolling couple of a balanced four-cylinder engine, with this arrangement provides a better result than that of a six-cylinder unit. Fig. 2.47. Secondary balancer (Mitsubishi Motors). Fig. 2.48. Secondary balancer as fitted to Porsche engine. The Porsche 944 engine (Fig. 2.48) installs a double-sided toothed belt, to drive the counter-balance shafts. The balancer system on this engine reduces the noise level by 20 dB. When the secondary vibration, especially at high engine speed is minimized, it provides a reduction of the ‘boom’, which is felt and heard in the passenger compartment. In addition, a decrease in secondary vibration lengthens the life of engine auxiliaries such as emission control equipment, electrical and fuel supply components and management systems, which incorporate electronic devices.
  9. Engine blueprinting What blueprinting REALLY is. Contributed By: Enginebasics.com I would argue that the most abused word in the engine building world is the word Blueprinting. This word is now tossed around with anyone who has a high-performance motor built these days. In-fact, it appears that EVERYONE seems to have a blueprinted race motor if you look at for sale ads on classic trader. Are this many people paying the $10-$20 THOUSAND DOLLARS to have a blueprinted motor built, or do people not really understand what a fully blueprinted motor really is? I would argue that it’s the later in that question. Most people assume that if their machinist measured and bored the motor to match the pistons. And if the machinist measured and matched the rod and crank bearings then BOOM, you have a fully blueprinted motor. The reality is this is FAR FROM the case. Some people say the machinists are to blame since they “SELL” their customers on this idea that there motor is blueprinted to increase sales. Some people say the customers are to blame since everyone wants to say they have a “blueprinted” motor these days. Whoever it was….. who really cares. Everything described above is things that your SHOULD BE doing any time you assemble a motor. Lets clear things up then. To really blueprint a motor requires an INSANE amount of time, and an INSANE amount of parts. Every part of the motor will be measured and balanced to each-other in a manner that will require going through dozens of pistons, rods, bearings….it’s incredible. In the last fully blueprinted motor build I was involved in, we had to order three sets of pistons from the manufacturer before we came up with eight that were all within a thousands of spec. We ordered four sets of rods before we came up with four that were all within spec of each-other. The manufactures are not to blame. Technically each set could have been used to build a motor that would have run for 200k miles, and could have been balanced to work just like any other motor with some machining on the crank. A true blueprinted motor though, is one were every single part has been measured and matched exactly to a tolerance that FAR EXCEDES the manufacturers original tolerances. On a blueprinted motor one could say there “are no tolerances”, since everything is matched at times to a hundred thousands of an inch. The amount of balancing a blueprinted motor needs is so low its off the scale. All bearing and races are measured to be with-in thousands of each-other. Hopefully you see there is a lot more to a blueprinted motor than just having some things measured and machined to fit. Blueprinting is a long process requiring LOTS of parts to find them within spec of each other, and LOTS of machinist time in measuring and scoping everything. The actual motor is measured and put into tolerance instead of machining components to balance at the crank. So does all this really mater? For a street motor I would argue no. In reality blueprinting a motor is all about getting every last inch of performance out of it, no matter what the cost. While a blueprinted motor will rev faster, have less rotational power losses, and harmonically be stronger, its not worth the money for a street application. Are there such a thing as blueprinted motors out there….. absolutely. But are the thousands of blueprinted motors you see advertised on ebay really blueprinted? Well, I’ll let you be the judge.
  10. richard

    E36 328I Track Car

    nice, looking smart.
  11. richard

    e36 racecar

    update: So had to widen the guards from felony form by 35 mm over their std 45mm to a total 80mm not ideal but have chosen function over fashion. Still have to do the fronts but I'm wanting for front bumper to make my finale decision on how they will be formed. These won't be everyone's cup of tea but hay, its mine. Pics:
  12. richard

    e36 racecar

    NO mufflers straight pipes turned out by rear wheels
  13. richard

    e36 racecar

    wheels are 18x10j offset +20 I also have 17mm spaces
  14. consider entry points. ie ; are you going to enter, drive in the 7m side or the 5m side, windows for work bench etc
  15. richard

    e36 racecar

    so on the weekend I chopped out some fat. To be fare was only 8kg'ish. But when adding new parts a balance has to be found. note the extra room for the diffuser.
  16. what's the cost of the engine rebuild if you don't mind me asking
  17. richard

    e36 racecar

    my mistress has booty!!!!! And because were on a diet goes in for a nip and tuck on the weekend
  18. I'm after an oil cooler something like this... new or used must be in good nic. Thanks
  19. watching the airbags go off reminded me of popcorn.
×
×
  • Create New...