E36 2 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 (edited) http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=265466190 Looks like a nice car. Wasn't this one competing in the Intermarque Sprints a while back? But now in Christchurch. Some quick times from memory. Edited January 15, 2010 by E36 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dyl 4 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 agreed, but is the 3.0L really more reliable than the 3.2? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mitchE30 0 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 nice M3 in yellow Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3 SERIES 92 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 Good price! Need the leather vader seats imo. Some much more classy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
e30plz 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 Need the leather vader seats imo. Some much more classy.I still like the cloth vaders. Any vaders would be nice tbh. Tiz a very nice car imo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skidz 196 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=265466190 Looks like a nice car. Wasn't this one competing in the Intermarque Sprints a while back? But now in Christchurch. Some quick times from memory. Has The Surgery Intermarque series sticker on the window still! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hybrid 1039 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 agreed, but is the 3.0L really more reliable than the 3.2? Just a rumor created because of the noob owner vs 6 speed gear box issure, double vanos seals drying up (same as owning a e46, e39, x5, z series blah blah) and oil sprocket nut coming off which is a very easy fix of lock tighting it. Thus giving it a tag of being unrealible.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ari Gold Report post Posted January 15, 2010 Not so much a reliability issue Dylan, more the fact that the 3L's seem to be pretty healthy when they're dyno'd, compared to the 3.2L's which seem a little anaemic. You're more likely to find a 3L dropping 300hp than a 3.2 dropping 321hp Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BM WORLD 1261 Report post Posted January 15, 2010 with the 3.2L its advisable to replace big end bearings. there are pretty much no parts for the 6 spd gearboxes . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elmarco 56 Report post Posted January 16, 2010 I like it! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greg111 13 Report post Posted January 16, 2010 Cheap too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dyl 4 Report post Posted January 17, 2010 Interesting. So really the question is, buy a 3.2L for 22K and up or pay 17K for a tidy 3L. I think you'll probably see less depreciation out of the 3.2, but theres no point in buying a car thats going to need heaps of stuff replaced. ORRRR buy an E30 M3. Did anyone look at that 1984 AC Schnitzer M6 from Tauranga? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
