Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
handgrenade

E36/E46 318 fuel economy experience

Recommended Posts

Hi all

A friend is looking for a daily which is more economical than his current wrx. Can anyone here please provide any experience they have of how thirsty a 318 is? Are they safe to run on 91 fuel?

Any responses appreciated. He is thinking of a

St205 celica fwd which by online info is worse than his wrx!!!

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

manual e36 318ti , run them on 95 , ,

or e36 316i or 318i manual , all the auto's suck ,make the car heavy and use lots more fuel.

e46 is heavier so probably will use more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My manual 328i is about 10-12% more economical than my old Legacy RS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My parents E46 318i manual with M43 motor averages about 35mpg around Hamilton and low 40mpg open roads. Pretty good for a heavy car i think.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an E46 318i sedan auto and it used piss all fuel. Very economical

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.fuelly.com/car/bmw/318i/1999/TopSecret/217347

My fuel economy seems to vary markedly. My car is due for a major service though. What would people recommend I check over while I do that?

I started off filling it only with 98, but the performance felt identical with 91 and the fuel economy seemed to improve.. strangely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our e36 318 which has been converted to manual does 700 to 800 ks on a tank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My e36 318i did around 10l/100km, e46 318i 8l/100km mixed driving

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should mention I had the e36 with the soch engine in manual so that's why I'd say the e46 doch had better economy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

manual e36 318ti , run them on 95 , ,

or e36 316i or 318i manual , all the auto's suck ,make the car heavy and use lots more fuel.

e46 is heavier so probably will use more

Yup around town they are horrid for the size of the motor.

Those Auto box's I am sure they sourced from an HQ Holden or something.

This is the closest one I could find to my driving City/Highway %.

http://www.fuelly.com/car/bmw/318ti/1997/Taku9/241046

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys .. Despite my efforts he won't buy a BMW as he thinks it will cost him lots in maintenance. Although a small win .. He's not buying a celica !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys .. Despite my efforts he won't buy a BMW as he thinks it will cost him lots in maintenance. Although a small win .. He's not buying a celica !!

Apparently he hasn't compared Toyota parts prices with BMW ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Genuine BMW parts from dealer vs repco branded japanese parts is the usually idiots comparision.

Parents bought their E46 at 42,000 and its done over 100,000 now. The Oonly things replaced beside usually maintenance items have been a DISA valve, heater resistor and a control arm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Apparently he hasn't compared Toyota parts prices with BMW ones.

Are they similar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Parents bought their E46 at 42,000 and its done over 100,000 now. The Oonly things replaced beside usually maintenance items have been a DISA valve, heater resistor and a control arm.

to be fair, those are things that shouldnt be breaking on a car thats done 100k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they similar?

Well... Dad owned one Toyota, and after the reaming he got on the required parts for it, he brought a BMW and has been raving about how little it's cost him over the last 15 years, and Dads a stickler for replacing anything that might cause him a problem.

BMW parts are surprisingly cheap in a lot of cases, especially on older cars, and there are a lot of aftermarket options too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to be fair, those are things that shouldnt be breaking on a car thats done 100k

2 of them are common E46 weak points so its not really suprising, not to mention its a 14 year old car nowl so its not just km that have an influence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ agree. My e46 had DISA valve died as well as a nearby intake rubber pipe cracked. Probably due to engine bay heat over the years.

Control arm bushes were munted too. That was when the car at 8 years old at 90-100 thousand kays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what its worth, last year my flatmate had a WRX and i had a e46 328cia. We found that they would use roughly the same amount of fuel on average despite me having 200kgs and 800ccs on him. His could use less fuel if he kept off that turbo though.

Om5Vk3hl.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...